Monday, 30 March 2009

30th of March, Reviewing 'Plunge' and Planning!

Today, to me, turned out to be a very productive day. We reviewed the final continuity editing/ Film Noir piece (ours); learned about some new camera related issues and worked in our current 'Twilight Zone' project groups. Watching Plunge for what feels like the 10th time was very inspiring. Not because, as one would assume, because it was so great that I want to make a film to match it. Rather quite the opposite; today I saw in Plunge all the flaws that could so easily have been avoided. As the editor for that film, I am actually a bit disappointed, as I remembered it to be better than that. I was also quite upset with the fact that very few people gave feedback to our film, despite the fact that most of my group gave lots of thoughts on everyone else's. Below are some notes I took on what I, and a few others, had to say about the film in terms of editing:

Plunge

  • It dragged on a lot, with slow dialogue (acting could have been better)
  • Transitions and cuts could have been 'snappier' to increase the pace
  • The structure was not appropriate for the length of the film; the voice-over introduction set it up for a much longer piece and gave some unnecessary information
  • Some audio problems i.e. different noise levels between cuts, brought down the production value a bit
  • Could have been more sounds (phone buttons being pressed)
  • Production value was overall quite high - :)

I also learnt a new word:

Diagetic Sound;
A sound that is created by something or someone visible on the screen or whose source is implied to be present by the action of the film. Non-
Diagetic sounds are “added” sounds like music and voice overs.

http://hhh.gavilan.edu/grichards/hum4/terms_000.html

and a new term:

Production Value;
A method, material, or skill used in the production of a motion picture; the technical quality of such a method, material, or skill.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/production_value

The Technician ('TT') also told us that from now on we have to reserve film equipment two days before filming...WITH a finished storyboard. This is both a good and  a bad thing, as it will mean we will actually always have to have a proper storyboard done, which is both tedious and actually a good thing because we will have something proper planned. We will also have to do proper shot logging, which I suppose will come in handy when we edit, but is still super annoying.

When we got into our groups, we basically just finalized our locations and ideas. Originally we were going to plan today, as we were hoping to be done by the end of this week, but that just really isn't possible as we don't have a storyboard or anything. SO instead we are going to film tomorrow after school; hopefully we will get three locations down, preferably the first three (IKEA, a traffic-y street and an office) so that we know properly the pace that the next ones will follow (as the protagonist will be running etc.). Today we are definitely a lot closer to actually knowing what we are doing than we were last time. 

I think that today I was both a thinker and a communicator (see below). We were having an issue with how the protagonist dies, whether he dies in the abstract 'day' or back at home. I reasoned that it would be best if he dies while at home, so that the abstract 'day' can be like a sort of drunken flashback, during which we will be able to use lots of shaky, disorienting shots to up the crazy factor. We also worked really well together in terms of planning. Tomorrow is not the best for me, as I have two activities, however we worked it out by deciding to film later, so that the cinematographer and director can finalize the shots and so that we can all be present while filming. Our aim now is to get done filming by the end of this week (sunday) so that next week (what little there is of it) can be devoted to editing. All in all, one of the most productive classes so far!


Thinkers: Exercise initiative in applying thinking skills critically and creatively to recognize and approach complex problems, and make reasoned, ethical decisions.

Communicators: Understand and express ideas and information confidently and creatively in more than one language and in a variety of modes of communication. They work effectively and willingly in collaboration with others.

Film Review: Kung Fu Hustle

Kung Fu Hustle

- From walking disaster to kung fu master


Directed by: Stephen Chow
Written by: Stephen Chow and Xin Huo
Released on the 23rd December, 2004
Starred in by: Stephen Chow, Yuen Wah, Yuen Qiu and Chan Kwok Kuen
Genre: Action, Comedy, Fantasy

Set in Canton, China in the 1940s, the story revolves around a town ruled by the Axe Gang. The protagonist (of sorts), called Sing, desperately wants to become a member. He stumbles into a slum ruled by eccentric landlords who are actually kung-fu masters in disguise. Sing's actions eventually cause the Axe Gang and the slumlords to engage in an explosive kung-fu battle. Sing turns out to be a kung-fu natural himself, and in the end gets everything he had ever hoped for.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0373074/


Originally I decided to watch Kung Fu Hustle because I had heard that it was a very funny Chinese film, and I wanted to both have a good time and practice my Chinese. I had no idea it would be the out-there, crazy adventure that it turned out to be! First of all I had to put on English subtitles, as I could not properly understand it all in Chinese. Then came the crazy plot; superhuman powers, impossible acts...it was full of everything that I do not associate with Chinese films. In my opinion it was a very Baz Luhrmann type film (like Moulin Rouge), rich in visual material, from crazy slow-motion scenes, to sped up running (like the cartoon type - legs going around in circles) and strong sounds. The plot was a bit poor, and kept jumping from story to story, so it wasn't entirely clear who the protagonist was until closer to the end, nor what the point of the film was.

The most interesting aspect of the film was definitely editing. The footage was very well put together, and had the right balance of close-ups interlaced with moving shots, even if it was all a little crazy. There were also some very interesting shots and ways of showing certain scenes. In a scene where someone gets punched in the face, rather than showing the punch, the screen gets punched and 'blood and flesh' are splattered onto the lens, which really gave me as a viewer the sense of being punched.

My favorite film happens to be Moulin Rouge, however that is more for the plot than the way that it is edited (although that adds to it too!). However despite the fact that Kung Fu Hustle was similar in style, and that it was very well done for the crazy type of film that it is, I'm not entirely sure how much I liked it. It is for sure that this is a one-off in Chinese cinema, and definitely a must-see for those who are tired of the average rom com/tear jerker/ superhero film!

Wednesday, 25 March 2009

25th March, Reviewing films!

Today, rather than properly planning out our first film session - which will hopefully happen on monday - we watched all the films from the last project and gave proper feedback on them, in relation to our former roles. Unfortunately we did not have time to get to ours, which was incredibly frustrating as I really want to hear what everyone thought. The ones that we did watch were really interesting though, and I think the fact that we have watched them before actually made for a better analytical experience, as I could focus more on the specifics rather than just trying to understand the plot. I mainly focused on, as editor, aspects of linear continuity, the different techniques/ transitions that were used and general 'flow'. Below are some notes on what I thought about each film respectively.

Natalia

  • Some out-of-place shots that disoriented the audience
  • Obvious changes in ambient light and sound
  • Several faulty match-on-action shots
  • Broke the 180 degree rule
  • Quite slow (pace-wise), as well as lacking in flow
  • No clear focus or aim in the film
  • Nice closing shot, zooming out of the protagonist - shows how small he feels
Stratagem
  • Dragging pace and slow transitions (pause between dialogue = unnatural)
  • Some out-of-place shots (car keys being thrown) ruins the flow
  • A couple of good match-on-action transitions - should have done more with that
  • Some very obvious fade-in fade-outs; the 'waiting' scene was also strange, not only unsuitable for the theme of the film but also the camera work was quite jog-y, which was obvious when the scenes were cut into each other
The Broken Beautiful

  • Nice 'drunk' effects - out of focus and jog-y
  • A couple of strange black screens
  • Continuity error with the gun
  • Broke the 180 degree rule
  • Songs could have been played throughout
Pulse

  • Gritty room was a bit out of place
  • Lighting was different in every location - did not flow well
  • Flashback in black and white was too cliche
  • Happy song with phone was out of place
  • Nice closing scene - black screen 'don't wait up for me tonight'


Looking at these notes, I know that they are mostly all negative, however I feel like before I can even think about trying to produce a 'knock-out' film, it is important first to get the basics down and to eliminate all amateur mistakes. Most films made the same type of mistakes - mostly with match-on-action shots that don't flow, strange sound and innapropriate shots. In the films however there were also some elements that I really liked. The dream-like quality of 'The Broken Beautiful' had a really big impact. Watching these films also gave me new ideas into possible concepts I could incorporate in upcoming film projects, such as having a recurring track or symbol, using shots that literally show how the protagonist is feeling and keeping cuts to a certain time (possibly speeding them up).


Today I was definitely a reflective learner (see below), as I took into consideration all the aspects of editing that were being critiqued so that our next project can avoid that (even though I am sound editor in this one). I see the mistakes that I made reflected in other people's work, and during our discussion I now know what it is exactly that editing needs to bring to the project. It is not solely a matter of stringing shots together; it creates the mood and flow of the entire peace, ultimately 'making or breaking' it. During this project I will definitely work closely with our editor (Jing Ting) so that we don't risk making the same mistakes again.

Even though we were not working in our current film groups today, as sound editor I tried to take note of what could be improved sound-wise in other peoples films. When I actually get round to doing the sound editing, I will definitely go to Mr.Chiang and Ms.Wong for help when I need it - a concept that actually never really occurred to me, as I had previously planned to simply look up sound editing techniques online. I noticed that the main errors with other films were the change in ambient sound from shot to shot. The narration also sounded strange when it was on its own, as it was clearly filmed in a silent room; no background noise is very unnatural. As we have narration in our upcoming film, I will have to remember to film in a natural environment (preferably on location). I feel like I got a lot from this class, but I can't wait until next class, to see what people have to say about ours!

Reflective learners: Give thoughtful consideration to their own learning and experience. They are able to assess and understand their strengths and limitations in order to support their learning and personal development.

Monday, 23 March 2009

23rd of March, Planning!

We had a single period of film today, during which we worked on the logistics of our 'twilight zone' film concept. We have now decided that it would be wise to use our group members as the characters in the film, as they are the only ones whom we could rely on to actually show up. We decided that Julien would be best, as he is the only boy and boys generally seem more screwed up in this kind of film, which is the sense we are aiming towards; the kind of 'oppressed life, lost and screwed up' feel. Our aim with this project is to leave people feeling 'empty' after it is over.

Today I feel like I was a thinking and communicative learner. Our group cooperated very well today, and we got a lot of work done, largely I feel due to my effective leadership. I also feel like I put thought into the decisions that were made; they were not made simply to have somehting to work with. This is evident through the 'chase' aspect that we chose; rather than having our protagonist being chased by something, I decided that our protagonist should be the one who does the chasing. He will be chasing an ever-present-but-ever-elusive white 'ideal' or 'dream'. It is definitely going to be abstract, but I think if we do it properly we can pull it off. I thought it would be really interesting to do this as I'm sure almost every other group is going to be doing it the other way round. Our 'portals' will be linked with the changing locations; the locations represent grotesquely blown-up versions of the scenarios our protagonist encounters in every day life. For instance, to represent transportation, we are going to film on a traffic-jam packed road. The switch between locations will be the 'portals', but we are not entirely sure yet as to what they will be exactly.

There was not much for me to do as regards my role as sound editor, however we have decided now what type of music is going to be our backing track; haunting classical music. This is good, as now I have more of a direction to look in while searching for appropriate material. We have also decided to include some sounds such as panting (while running) and the sound of our protagonist being stabbed. Next class I think we shall record the voice-over, so as to get a head start on the footage, and so that I can upload it and have a timeline (of sound) to work with. Depending on how quickly the filming is done, I might actually get the sound done first, especially as we are not including many of the natural sounds (running etc.). This way when we edit, the visuals can match the music better, so it flows better. I want it to be a film that indulges all the sense; abrupt changes at changes in the music, climax at the crescendo etc. I'm very excited! Also this way I can get a feel of the software before I actually have to work on it because of time constraints.

Originally we had planned to film today (after school), but we decided at the very last minute that as we don't really have enough planned (in terms of a literal storyboard) we could not just go film. Hopefully we will get filming some time this week, as we really need to get a move on! Jing Ting and I realized today that in total we need to film on four separate days. We have a total of 11 locations, which is quite a lot, but we are going to keep the film short by only showing each location for a total of around 30 seconds (to keep the pace up - something that I need to remember as that was a fault in our last film). I'm really happy with our work as a group today, as we were all on-task, and our idea is finally taking shape, albeit still a slightly fuzzy one.


Thinkers: Exercise initiative in applying thinking skills critically and creatively to recognize and approach complex problems, and make reasoned, ethical decisions.

Communicators: Understand and express ideas and information confidently and creatively in more than one language and in a variety of modes of communication. They work effectively and willingly in collaboration with others.

Wednesday, 18 March 2009

18th March, Planning our project

From such a promising start I feel like our group has backtracked a lot. Today we had a double period, but we ended the class with even less done than when we had started it. This is mostly due to the fact that we could not decide on a pretext to the reason why our protagonist is being chased. Our whole group had different ideas, and we could not seem to come up with an idea that everyone was happy with. I actually got really frustrated as I realized that all the work we had done on our original idea, which was actually quite a lot - we had planned when we would film, the order of locations, the different portals, everything - was done for absolutely nothing.

In retrospect, despite the fact that I was in quite a bad mood today and we managed to use up almost a whole double period, I think we ended up handling the situation well. I feel like I was a thinker today (see below), as I reached the decision that the only way we could resolve this problem, and with a solution that would make sense (as all our ideas together would spell for a very strange plot indeed) was to let one person decide. I felt that, as Julien is our director/ screenplay writer - and a very good writer over all - we would at least have something to work with if we let him decide on the basis for our plot. After we have the initial idea, the rest will hopefully all just fall into place, and the other members can contribute on other things.

I actually quite like the direction that he has chosen to go in, which is more abstract than our last idea; it is about a boy is very dissatisfied with his life. Although we are no longer going with the Film Noir theme, our protagonist's character is very similar to Noir protagonists. The chase is going to be him chasing an unclear object (for this we will have someone dressed in white, but you will never see them clearly) which represents 'happiness'. The locations that the portals link to are representations of the routine of his life; his bed, school etc. I think we could really do something with this plot, especially with the editing.

As regards sound, however, I feel like this is going to be a challenge. Along with scrapping the old concept of random scenes, I have also decided to scrap the 'different-music-with-every-different-location' idea. I think one constant, appropriate track will suffice; preferably a hollow tune, with a crescendo at the end for the final scene (which is a secret!). We have also decided to go with muting all the action, and only having a voice-over from the protagonist. I'm not entirely sure what the tone of the film will be yet; either crazy, depressed or what, but I know it will definitely be strange, which I find much more interesting to watch than happy movies. I have been looking up some music on freeplaymusic.com, but as of yet, without the definite theme, I can't really pick music that will match. Sound editing comes last anyway.

I forgot to hand in my project evaluation for Plunge today, which I am really annoyed about, as I actually brought to class and everything.

Thinkers: They exercise initiative in applying thinking skills critically and creatively to recognize and approach complex problems, and make reasoned, ethical decisions.

Monday, 16 March 2009

16th of March, New project!

Rather than giving feedback on the films we watched last class during the screening, which is what we were meant to be doing today, we got into groups for our new project, which is going to be about portals and entering/ leaving different places and is related to the twilight zone. I'm in a group with: Julien, Medora and Jing ting. I am going to be the sound editor, which I'm actually really excited about, because I will still be using Final Cut Pro while also working with sound, which is something that I didn't really do last time. It also means that I will be working closely with our editor, Jing Ting, so I can teach her some things about Final Cut Pro, as well as generally oversee the editing process. 

Today I feel like I was a communicator (see below). We made really good headway for only having had what was really only a single period with our groups. I really took initiative and organized our thoughts as a group into a coherent idea, one that our director and writer (Julien) will now put into a proper narrative/ script. I have a really good feeling about this project.

In preparation for my role as sound editor, I will research some possible music (as we have decided to mesh lots of different songs together, so that the music changes with every location change - which means a LOT of different music!) as well as research about Final Cut Pro and sound editing. The fact that there will be very little dialogue (only really in the first and last scenes - and only then just a few lines) means that there won't be any need to deal with audible dialogue. However I will need ambient sounds (such as splashes from water and general sounds), so I will need to think about what will be the best microphone to use....I'm so excited!

Communicators: Understand and express ideas and information confidently and creatively in more than one language and in a variety of modes of communication. They work effectively and willingly in collaboration with others.

Sunday, 15 March 2009

Project Evaluation

The film we produced, Plunge, was, in my opinion, a huge success. The original idea came from a screenplay that our director/ writer (Jeff) wrote prior to the project. We went over it in class as a group, but to be honest it was pretty much a complete script unto itself. We altered a few things in class, such as taking out some of the swearing and changing some of the phrasing, but Julien did the proper editing himself at home. As editor, there was no real contribution I could make, other than take note of how the film would actually be played out and what transitions could be used as well as how I could adapt scenes to make the whole thing more film noir-esque.

Our planning and production period were mingled, as we planned certain scenes at a time, then filmed, then planned the next scenes, then filmed, rather than planning the whole film first. During the planning that we did, I did not really have a job to do other than to stay aware of the shots that were being story boarded and how the film would be played out. This was quite difficult though, as our cinematographer only really story boarded the first scene (the rest was planned purely in his mind). To stay useful, I was put in charge of planning our filming time (deciding what our time frame would be to ensure we had enough time – see below for example) and I wrote out the shot list. I tried to make myself available for whatever anyone needed doing, so I ended up being the person who got the lights from Mr.Wong and mixing up a concoction to look like blood.

First filming day:
People: Jeff, Chris, Julien, Raphael
Equipment: HD camera, Tripod (with dolly legs), Boom microphone, bounce card, searchlights, big lights
6:00 - Everyone meets at Julien's house
6:30 - Start filming house scene
7:30 - Eat dinner
8:00 - Go down to waterfront
8:15 - Rehearse waterfront scene and run through camera angles
9:00 - Start filming waterfront scene
11:00 - End

During the actual production stage I did not have a particular job, but I showed up for filming anyway. I started out doing the shot logging but that stopped being useful after we filmed over some footage and the list no longer made sense. I also helped out with odd jobs, such as holding the bounce card when our lighting man was in the scene (Chris was an actor in our film as well as the lighting man) and holding the boom microphone while our sound man was otherwise engaged (which was actually quite a lot of the time). I also gave some advice on shots and angles. The scene on the roof, for example, includes one extra angle that has not previously been planned (see below). I also, as aforementioned, was in charge of making the blood, which I did by making gravy, then sieving it, then adding loads of red food coloring. A problem we had was with timing. Although we made time plans (or rather, I made time plans) it was always really hard to stick to them, as filming always took longer than we anticipated due to the lack of preparation. We overcame this by filming on more nights. We originally planned to do it in 2 nights, as we wanted to have it done before Julien went away to Japan (our cinematographer and lead actor) but we ended up doing it in 4 nights instead. This was decided very much against our director's wishes, who would rather stay out really late filming and finish (so that we would have more time to edit) than do it on more days. But we all agreed and managed to talk him round. Jeff is very brilliant, but he is also very stubborn. Luckily our teamwork paid off and we compromised. Our last film day did go on until 12 at night though, but that was unavoidable.

The post-production was the portion where I feel I did the most work, and understandably, as I was the editor. Although I did actually do a lot of editing, I think that Jeff probably did more. I was always present though, it's just sometimes he liked to be in charge of the mouse. He never let me edit it without him there, which I understand (he is a perfectionist after all), but I think I should have argued more for my rights as editor. I learnt so much about editing in the process though.


Some notes on what I learned:
Press N to turn on/off snapping
You can add tracks
You can edit clips before inputting them into the timeline
Clips can be either inserted or overwritten into the timeline
You can mute certain tracks
Sound can be turned up or down by altering the decibel level
'Slugs' can be inputted, putting in a black scene


Even though Jeff did a lot of editing, I always gave my advice, especially when I didn’t agree with what he was doing. This worked well, and we managed to compromise a lot on what should be done. We agreed at the start not to argue (as we are both strongly opinionated) and that seemed to work our quite well. Jeff ended up doing loads though, especially as our sound person pretty much did nothing, so Jeff ended up working on the sound too. I was mostly present for that too, and I found that very educational as well. However I feel that Jeff kind of went overboard sometimes. He insisted on, after we thought we were done, moving the sound files onto the sound system Sound Cut Pro, which I thought was completely unnecessary. We managed to finish on time though, and I have to say I was quite happy with the result.

Our final product, which was supposed to be a two-person dialogue scene, ended up being an 11-minute short film. That said, I am still extremely happy with it. I would say our initial goal of creating a film noir piece was definitely achieved. Our group worked well together, though some people were not as focused as they could have been, which may have slowed us down a bit. Although Jeff did a lot of the editing, I feel I played my role in the group well. I was always there and on task during the editing; just sometimes Jeff wanted it to be done in a particular way that I did not know how to do. I learnt a lot though, and I got to exercise my newly learned skills (because I did edit myself as well – with Jeff’s guidance). We have not received much feedback yet, but when we do I shall post it on my blog. If we could improve our job in any way, I think it would have been beneficial if everyone had done more research at home, including me. I should have taken some kind of Final Cut Pro tutorial. Also, in terms of how we could have improved as a group, we should have been more on task during our filming and class sessions. We could have been more focused if one of us simply took the initiative to tell everyone off. Other than this though, I think our work on this project was good, and we managed to finish on time despite our shortcomings.

During this project I was definitely an ‘inquirer’ (according to the IB learner profile). I was always interested in the different aspects of the film process and I tried to give my input wherever I could. Even though I had to sit through hours of Jeff editing/ working on sound on the computer, I was actively engaged and paying attention. I actually enjoyed learning about Final Cut Pro, and I hope to be able to use my new skills on a later project.

Wednesday, 11 March 2009

11th of March, Screening!

Screenings are my favorite part of film class, I love seeing everyones final products! I also especially like it when I am happy with my group's work, as I was with this project. We spent the first half of the class importing it (as it was filmed on an HD camera, it took ages), as did the rest of the class, but we started watching everyone else's during the second period. Today I think I was an open-minded learner (see below), as although there were groups who produced films that some would call 'bad', but I see how they are simply another persons perspective of how film noir can be conveyed.

Of the four films we watched in class, each had different strengths and weaknesses. A general aspect that all of them could of improved on though, was in sound editing. The transitions between angles brought with them an obvious change in background sound; either softening, which made the fact that there was background noise before evident, or becoming louder. This is acceptable if the transition is between scenes i.e. from one location to the next, like in our film where the location changes from the cul-de-sac to the waterfront. But it is not acceptable it if is a different angle of the same scene, as it ruins the illusion of what is happening and reminds the audience that the film is made (and badly, at that).

Some of the films were also quite poorly edited; I noted that the 180 degree rule was broken more than once. I have to admit that in our film we did this too, but ours was done tastefully, and it looked okay. The rule-breakings I am referring to were disorienting and weird. There were also some continuity errors as regards match on action shots, which again ruined the illusion of 'reality'.

I have to say though that I really enjoyed the story lines of all the films. They were very different to what I remember films being like last year, and much more 'risque'. We are now into the world of the damned, which I find makes for much more interesting film content than happy 'everything-is-great' stories. This is a great development as I feel that taking risks really opens up the world of film to us as students. I'm now really excited for our next project! 


Open-minded learners: Understand and appreciate their own cultures and personal histories, and are open to the perspectives, values and traditions of other individuals and communities. they are accustomed to seeking and evaluating a range of points of views, and are willing to grow from the experience.

Monday, 9 March 2009

9th of March, Final Editing!

Today we only had a single class, our last class before the showings of our films! To be honest, we were pretty much done before the class, as Jeff and I stayed after school on friday afternoon to edit for a couple of hours. However, as usual, Jeff wanted to fix problems that were hardly there. We tidied up the timeline of the film by cutting the unnecessary parts of the clips and putting all the visuals on one track, which made everything much more manageable and neat, much to Jeff's liking. We tried to do the same with the sound, but that was more difficult as the film has several sounds going on at once, so they couldn't all be on one track. 

Today I think I was a thinker (see below), because I actually used the skills that I have acquired during the editing of this project (from Jeff) to alter the timeline. This shows that I was able to not only recognize what could be improved but also that I was able to work out the best way to change it; and by working using my own skills!

Thinkers: Exercise initiative in applying thinking skills critically and creatively t recognize and approach complex problems, and make reasoned, ethical decisions. 

Wednesday, 4 March 2009

4th March, Editing!

Today Jeff and I spent the whole class editing the footage that we filmed last week and yesterday. I feel like today I was a thinker (see below). I really enjoy being in a group with Jeff, as he is actually a really talented cinematographer, editor, sound person....generally everything to do with film, but it is also slightly annoying as nothing that any of us do is ever good enough. So, to solve this problem, I told him that as I am editor, I should be allowed to work on it. And it worked! Even better, Jeff gave me brief tutorials! I have learnt so much about editing! From turning snapping on to shortening clips before inserting them to make editing time shorter to incorporating fades so that sounds mesh together better. 

One particular aspect that worked on today was trying to incorporate more film noir themes, such as low-key lighting and hard/harsh shots. Our film is already quite noir-esque in its setting; a dystopian, immoral world where the difference between good and evil is no longer visible, so we decided to try to get rid of any warm scenes. We played around with the color contrast a bit and I think it really worked! 

We actually got a lot of work done today, and we have edited all the footage that we have so far! We also found out that everyone has been given an extension to next wednesday rather than next monday, however to be honest I think we have been very well organized up to this point. We still need to film one last scene, which we are doing tonight, however we have lots of time to work on that. 

Thinkers: They exercise initiative in applying thinking skills critically and creatively to recognize and approach complex problems, and make reasoned, ethical decisions.

Tuesday, 3 March 2009

Film Review: Slumdog Millionaire

Slumdog millionaire


Directed By: Danny Boyle and Loveleen Tandan
Starred in by: Dev Patel and Freida Pinto

A Mumbai teen who grew up in the slums, becomes a contestant on the Indian version of "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?" He is arrested under suspicion of cheating, and while being interrogated, events from his life history are shown which explain why he knows the answers.

Personally, I loved this film. It does not particularly tie into Film Noir, which is the topic that we are covering in class at the moment, but I think that in terms of editing, this film is excellently done. The visuals are amazing, the plot is heart-wrenching and the sound track fits the film almost perfectly. As a film student, one of the aspects that stuck out to me was the way in which scenes transitioned into one another. The most memorable example of which is when the boys fall off the train, and get up as older boys. This type of subtle transition of time was very well done. I would recommend this film to everyone that likes a good tear jerker.


"Slumdog Millionaire (2008)." The Internet Movie Database (IMDb). 23 Mar. 2009 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1010048/.

Monday, 2 March 2009

2nd of March, editing and planning!

As we have already edited most of the footage, today was spent just tightening some things up. I feel like I was a balanced learner (see below) as I was quite open to what was going on around me. An example of this is in my actions today; although I'm editor, Jeff insisted on doing it. I understand that he likes things done in a certain way, so I let him do it, which turned out to be really educational for me watching him. I also contributed my thoughts on what he was doing/ what could be improved. This ensured that we did not argue, which has been a problem in the past, as I also like to have things done my own way. I think that next time though, when we get the footage for the rest of the film, I am going to edit. 

We also spent today planning for our final shooting session, which will take place tomorrow evening. Although we actually have two scenes to finish, I think we can get it done as we are much more prepared mentally than last time; Julien knows his lines and we know the location much better. We have also had more time to think about what is going on, which means that we have had more time to process what is expected. 

Although I really enjoy working with the other people in my group, I am having a hard time being nice to Raphael. Although he and I are friends, I repeatedly find myself getting agitated with him because he always seems unfocused and whiny. Today I tried really hard to get past that so as to remain on good terms with the rest of the group, which is important not only for our collective well-being but also for the quality of our project as a whole, however I'm not sure I can be this forgiving in future. I think maybe I need to talk to him. He is supposed to be in charge of both sound and the poster for our project, but he seems to be working on neither. This has to be remedied! I shall have a word with him before next class...

Balanced Learners: Understand the importance of intellectual, physical and emotional balance to achieve personal well-being for themselves and others.